Violation of Natural Justice in Customs Act Adjudication

The court found a violation of natural justice principles in adjudication proceedings under Section 124 of the Customs Act. The court set aside the order of adjudication due to the lack of opportunity for the writ petitioner to be heard before the final order was passed. The adjudicating authority was directed to allow the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice within a specified time frame and to conduct proceedings promptly, ensuring a fair hearing and a reasoned order. The court emphasized the importance of upholding natural justice principles and did not address the merits of the disputes, ultimately allowing the writ application with no order as to costs.

---

---

Issues: Violation of principles of natural justice in adjudication proceedings under Section 124 of the Customs Act.

In this judgment, the court highlighted a technical flaw in the order passed by the adjudicating authority in the adjudication proceedings under Section 124 of the Customs Act. The court acknowledged that the final order can be challenged in appeal but emphasized the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice. A writ application was disposed of by a learned Single Judge, directing the petitioner to file a reply within a specified time frame. The final order in the adjudication proceedings was passed without granting the writ petitioner an opportunity of hearing, which is a violation of the principles of natural justice. The court noted that even if there is a provision for appeal, the writ court retains jurisdiction to review orders for such violations.

The court pointed out that the writ petitioner was not given any opportunity of hearing before the order of adjudication was passed by the Commissioner of Customs, as required under Section 124(c) of the Customs Act. The Customs Authority argued that an opportunity of hearing was provided earlier, but the court stressed that such an opportunity must be given before passing the final order. Consequently, the court set aside the order of adjudication and directed the writ petitioner to file a reply to the show cause notice within a specified time. The adjudicating authority was instructed to dispose of the proceedings promptly after giving a hearing to the writ petitioner and passing a reasoned order in accordance with the law.

The court clarified that it did not delve into the merits of the disputes raised by the writ petitioner against the final order of adjudication, leaving those points to be decided by the Commissioner of Customs in the adjudication proceedings. Ultimately, the court set aside the impugned order, allowed the writ application, and made no order as to costs. All parties were directed to act on a signed copy of the order, and the judgment emphasized the importance of upholding principles of natural justice in adjudication proceedings under the Customs Act.

---