Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The primary issue in this case was whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax on the construction of residential complexes under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) Scheme for Surat Municipal Corporation. The appellant's counsel argued that this issue is no longer res-integra, citing various judgments where similar constructions under government schemes were held non-taxable.
Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal found that the construction services provided under the JnNURM scheme are not liable to service tax as they are not commercial in nature. This conclusion was supported by previous judgments, including the case of Rjp Infrastructure Private Limited, where it was held that such services are non-taxable.
In a related case, the Tribunal also examined whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax under the category of Construction of Complex service for constructing houses under JnNURM for Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and for Safai Kamdar housing. The appellant's counsel again argued that the issue is settled by various judgments, including those of M/s. Khurana Engineering Limited and DH Patel, which held that such constructions are not liable for service tax.
The Tribunal confirmed that the construction of residential complexes under the JnNURM scheme and for Safai Kamdar housing is intended for residential purposes for poor people and not for commercial activities. Therefore, these constructions are not liable to service tax. The Tribunal referred to several judgments, including those of M/s. Khurana Engineering Limited and Santosh Katiyar, which supported this view.
Additionally, the Tribunal noted that constructions for government organizations, such as the Gujarat State Police Housing Corporation Limited, are also not liable for service tax. This was supported by judgments in cases like S. Kadirvel and C.R. Patel, which clarified that constructions intended for personal use by government entities are excluded from service tax.
In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, confirming that the construction services under the JnNURM scheme and for Safai Kamdar housing are not liable to service tax.