Court rules on deduction for write-off and set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against capital gains

The court addressed issues regarding the deduction for write-off of debit balances and deposits, as well as the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against short-term capital gains. The court upheld the decision to disallow the deduction for write-off of debit balances due to lack of evidence of loss incurred during the assessment year. However, the court allowed the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against short-term capital gains, emphasizing that depreciation can be carried forward indefinitely and set off against income under any head, contrary to the ITAT's interpretation. The Assessee was permitted to set off the unabsorbed depreciation against short-term capital gains, resulting in a favorable outcome for the Assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Deduction for write-off of debit balances in Sundry Creditors' account and deposits.
2. Set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against short-term capital gains.

Summary:

Issue 1: Deduction for Write-off of Debit Balances

The first issue pertains to whether the Tribunal ought to have allowed a deduction for write-off of debit balances in Sundry Creditors' account of Rs. 18,264/- and deposits of Rs. 20,190/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed Rs. 77,264/- out of the amount of Rs. 1,29,039/- under Section 36(2)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] held that the Assessee had not furnished any evidence to show that the same was the loss incurred during the current assessment year, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld this decision. The Assessee did not press this question due to the small amounts involved, and the Court did not express any opinion on this issue.

Issue 2: Set-off of Unabsorbed Depreciation

The second issue is whether the Tribunal was justified in denying set-off of unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to the Assessment Years (AY) 1996-97 to 2001-02 aggregating Rs. 13,89,661/- against short-term capital gains. The AO disallowed the set-off based on a decision of the Special Bench of the Tribunal in DCIT v/s. Times Guaranty Limited, which held that depreciation was available for carry forward only for a period of 8 years and set off only against business income. The CIT(A) and ITAT upheld this view, rejecting the Assessee's reliance on the Gujarat High Court judgment in General Motors (India) Pvt. Ltd. v/s. DCIT, which allowed such set-off against income under any head.

The High Court, referencing its previous decision in PCIT vs. Gunnebo India Pvt Ltd., clarified that as per the provisions of Section 32(2) of the Act read with Sections 70, 71, and 72, the total depreciation, including unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years, becomes the total current year's depreciation and is allowed to be set-off against income under any head of income. The Court emphasized that the CBDT Circular No. 14 of 2001 clarified that the restriction of 8 years for carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation had been dispensed with, allowing such depreciation to be carried forward indefinitely and set off against profits and gains of subsequent years.

The High Court concluded that the ITAT had incorrectly interpreted the General Motors judgment and quashed the ITAT's order on this issue. The Assessee was permitted to set off the unabsorbed depreciation of Rs. 13,89,661/- against short-term capital gains. The appeal was accordingly disposed of.

---