TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision on Service Tax for Additional Services, No Dispute Found.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX Versus M/s SHAH PUBLICITY</h3> The SC dismissed the appeal challenging the CESTAT's decision regarding service tax on additional services. The Court found the Tribunal's conclusion ... Levy of Service tax on additional service provided - mounting of printed material or board - HELD THAT:- The Tribunal’s end conclusion does not suffer from any infirmity. However, while recording the finding, the Tribunal just omitted to mention couple of lines regarding the admitted case that the respondent had been paying service tax on any additional service provided regarding mounting of printed material or boards on which they had paid service tax, no further consideration would have been required. There are no infirmity in the final order of the Tribunal - appeal dismissed. Issues involved:The judgment deals with an appeal arising from a decision by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the payment of service tax on additional services provided.Details of the judgment:The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, heard arguments from both parties and reviewed the case records. The Court noted that the Tribunal's final conclusion was sound. However, it pointed out an omission in the Tribunal's findings in paragraph 6.8, where the Tribunal failed to mention that the respondent had already been paying service tax on additional services related to mounting printed material or boards. The Court emphasized that no further consideration was necessary in this regard.After considering the above, the Court found no fault with the Tribunal's ultimate decision. Since the observations made by the Court were not in dispute and the appellant did not challenge them, the appeal was dismissed. Additionally, any pending applications were deemed disposed of as a result of the dismissal of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
