Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the enhancement of the export value and rejection of the declared transaction value were sustainable when the adjudicating authority did not follow the prescribed valuation sequence and did not furnish the relied upon documents to the exporter.
Analysis: The declared export value was enhanced on the basis of contemporaneous prices, but the adjudicating authority did not establish comparable parameters such as quantity and destination, nor did it demonstrate that the valuation had proceeded through the prescribed sequence before resorting to the residual method. The record also showed that the exporter was not given the documents and material relied upon for loading the value, and the appellant was not put on notice of the basis on which rejection of the declared price was proposed. Compliance with the valuation rules and observance of natural justice were therefore lacking.
Conclusion: The enhancement of value and rejection of the declared transaction value were unsustainable, and the appeals were entitled to succeed.
Ratio Decidendi: Rejection of a declared export transaction value must be preceded by adherence to the prescribed valuation sequence and by disclosure of the relied upon material to the affected party; otherwise the enhancement cannot be sustained.