TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>GST Appeal Permitted Beyond Standard Limitation Period, Appellate Authority Directed to Examine Merits Comprehensively</h1> <h3>M/s AMBA SHAKTI UDYOG LTD. Versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAX, COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, MOTI, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX</h3> M/s AMBA SHAKTI UDYOG LTD. Versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAX, COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, MOTI, ... Issues involved: Petitioner challenging order u/s 74 of GST Act before High Court u/s 226 of Constitution of India. Summary: The petitioner, a manufacturer and trader, approached the High Court challenging the order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 74 of the GST Act. The petitioner raised several submissions criticizing the impugned order, including non-supply of attachments despite a show-cause notice, lack of consideration of facts by the Assessing Officer leading to a substantial tax liability, and non-consideration of the petitioner's reply. The High Court noted that the show-cause notice was issued and the order was passed by the Competent Authority, and the petitioner should have approached the appellate forum u/s 107 of the GST Act. Despite the alleged procedural irregularities, the High Court believed that these pleas could have been addressed in the appellate forum if raised. After some arguments, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and file an appeal u/s 107 of the GST Act, requesting condonation of the delay in filing the appeal. The respondent's counsel initially opposed this, stating that the petitioner was aware of the alternative remedy of appeal when filing the writ petition and that the delay due to the pendency of the writ petition should not be condoned. However, considering the principles of justice, equity, and good conscience, the High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal within 30 days u/s 107 of the GST Act. The Appellate Authority was directed not to insist on the question of limitation and to address the issues raised by the petitioner on facts, law, and alleged irregularities in the assessment. The petitioner was also granted the liberty to apply for interim protection, subject to legal constraints, which the Appellate Authority should promptly consider.
TaxTMI 