TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund under Rule 16 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 was admissible when the partnership firm changed its constitution into a private limited company, intimated sealing of all packing machines, and the machines remained sealed during the disputed period.
Analysis: Rule 16 applies where a manufacturer permanently ceases to work in respect of all machines installed in the factory and intimates surrender of registration. The intimation dated 22.06.2011 showed that the earlier partnership firm had ceased to exist on conversion into a private limited company, that fresh registration would be sought, and that all machines were sealed by the department from midnight of 24.06.2011. On those facts, no manufacture could take place from 25.06.2011 onwards. Rule 16 operates on a different footing from Rule 10, which concerns temporary non-production for a prescribed period. The fact that a new legal entity later commenced business with fresh registration did not undo the permanent cessation of the earlier entity for the purpose of Rule 16.
Conclusion: Refund under Rule 16 was rightly allowed, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the earlier manufacturer ceases to exist as a legal entity, all installed machines are sealed pursuant to intimation, and the factory remains non-operational for the relevant period, Rule 16 entitles the manufacturer to pro rata duty adjustment and refund of excess duty, notwithstanding a later change of constitution and fresh registration by a new entity.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
