Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order could be sustained when it was passed without affording an effective opportunity of hearing, and whether the writ appeal deserved to be allowed.
Analysis: The appellant had sought time to collect records and submit documents. The Assessing Authority proceeded to pass the assessment order without fixing a further date for hearing after the request for time. In the circumstances, the appellant could legitimately expect a notice fixing the date of hearing so that he could appear and place his materials. The omission to do so resulted in denial of an effective opportunity and rendered the assessment order unsustainable on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment order was liable to be set aside for breach of natural justice, and the writ appeal was allowed.
Final Conclusion: The assessment was annulled and the matter was left open for fresh consideration by the Assessing Authority after granting one more opportunity to the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order passed without granting an effective hearing, especially where the assessee has sought time to produce records, cannot be sustained as it violates the principles of natural justice.