Court allows condonation of 170-day appeal delay, closes cases on common order. Questions dismissed; profit attribution not entertained. The court allowed the condonation of a 170-day delay in re-filing the appeal, as the respondent had no objection. The appeals concerning Assessment Years ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court allows condonation of 170-day appeal delay, closes cases on common order. Questions dismissed; profit attribution not entertained.
The court allowed the condonation of a 170-day delay in re-filing the appeal, as the respondent had no objection. The appeals concerning Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2019-20, challenging a common order by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, were closed. Certain proposed questions were dismissed as covered by a previous decision, while others on profit attribution were not entertained due to lack of argument before statutory authorities. The parties were directed to act based on the digitally signed order copy.
Issues involved: Applications for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal, questions of law in appeals concerning Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2019-20.
Condensation of Delay in Re-filing the Appeal: The appellant/revenue filed applications seeking condonation of a 170-day delay in re-filing the appeal. The respondent/assessee had no objection to the delay being condoned. The court, considering the reasons provided in the applications, allowed the delay to be condoned and disposed of the applications accordingly.
Appeals Concerning Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2019-20: The appeals were related to Assessment Year 2017-18 and 2019-20, seeking to challenge a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The questions of law proposed in these appeals were similar. The questions of law included issues such as the determination of profit attributable to the Permanent Establishment (PE) of the Assessee in India, income from royalty, and the taxation of booking fees. The court noted that certain proposed questions were covered by a previous decision, and no substantial question of law arose in those instances. However, other proposed questions related to the attribution of profit were not entertained as they were not argued before the statutory authorities. Consequently, the appeals were closed, and the parties were directed to act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
