Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessees, allowing deduction for interest income from Co-operative Banks</h1> <h3>The Peoples Co-Op Credit Society Ltd., Shri Ambika Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd. Versus The Pr. CIT, Ahmedabad-3, Ahmedabad</h3> The Peoples Co-Op Credit Society Ltd., Shri Ambika Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd. Versus The Pr. CIT, Ahmedabad-3, Ahmedabad - TMI Issues Involved:1. Jurisdiction of PCIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.2. Taxability of interest/dividend received from Co-operative Banks under Section 80P(2)(d).Summary:Issue 1: Jurisdiction of PCIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax ActThe Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) exercised jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to revise the assessment orders for the Assessment Year 2018-19, arguing that the Assessing Officer (AO) had not properly examined the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The PCIT issued a show cause notice questioning the allowance of the deduction and cited the Supreme Court judgment in Totagars Cooperative Sale Society Ltd. vs. ITO. The assessee contended that the AO had made detailed inquiries during the assessment proceedings and that the deduction was allowed based on judicial precedents, including the assessee's own cases for earlier years where similar deductions were upheld by the ITAT.The Tribunal observed that the AO had indeed conducted a thorough inquiry and allowed the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) after due application of mind. The Tribunal cited various judicial precedents, including the Gujarat High Court's decision in Aryos Arcade Ltd. v. Pr. CIT, which held that a different belief by the Commissioner does not justify revision if the AO's view is plausible and based on full inquiry. The Tribunal concluded that the AO's order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue, thus invalidating the PCIT's jurisdiction under Section 263.Issue 2: Taxability of Interest/Dividend Received from Co-operative Banks under Section 80P(2)(d)The PCIT held that the interest income earned from Fixed Deposits (FDs), Savings Accounts, and Dividend Income from Co-operative Banks should be assessed as 'income from other sources' and denied the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The assessee argued that the interest income from Co-operative Banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d), supported by various judicial decisions, including the Gujarat High Court's ruling in State Bank of India v. CIT.The Tribunal noted that the Gujarat High Court in CIT vs. Sabarkantha District Co-Op. Milk Producers Union Ltd. had upheld the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest earned from investments in Co-operative Banks. The Tribunal also referred to the Karnataka High Court's decision in Totagars Cooperative Sales Society, which supported the assessee's claim for deduction. Based on these precedents, the Tribunal held that the interest income earned from Co-operative Banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d).Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessees, quashing the revision orders passed by the PCIT. The Tribunal ruled that the AO had made due inquiries and that the interest income from Co-operative Banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d).

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found