Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Assessee's appeal allowed due to lack of notice, Commissioner to reconsider</h1> <h3>Sant Kabir Mahasabha Versus The CIT (Exemption), Chandigarh.</h3> Sant Kabir Mahasabha Versus The CIT (Exemption), Chandigarh. - TMI Issues involved: Appeal against rejection of registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 due to lack of proper notice of hearing.Summary:Issue 1: Lack of proper notice of hearingThe appeal was filed against the rejection of the application for registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant contested the rejection on the grounds that the order was ex-parte, as the appellant was not given an opportunity to present its case. The appellant's counsel argued that no notice of the date of hearing was served, whether physically or electronically, and the appellant was unaware of any such notice being uploaded on the Income Tax Portal. The Tribunal noted that mere uploading of information on the Portal does not constitute effective service of notice under Section 282 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the Commissioner to re-decide the appeal after providing proper notice to the appellant through physical and electronic modes.Decision:The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee on the grounds of lack of proper notice of hearing, directing the Commissioner to re-decide the matter after ensuring adequate opportunity for the assessee to present its case. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.This summary highlights the key issues involved in the legal judgment and provides a detailed overview of the Tribunal's decision regarding the lack of proper notice of hearing in the case.