Assessment order challenged, cash payments scrutinized, LTCG taxed as undisclosed income.

The Ld. PrCIT found the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interests due to inadequate enquiries into cash payments and LTCG genuineness. The Ld. PrCIT directed to tax unexplained cash and third-party cheque payments under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE. Additionally, LTCG was taxed as undisclosed income. The assessee's appeal was dismissed, upholding the Ld. PrCIT's decisions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Source of cash payments towards credit card bills.
2. Genuineness of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) claimed as exempt under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act.

Summary:

Issue 1: Source of Cash Payments Towards Credit Card Bills

The assessee filed a return of income for A.Y. 2017-18 declaring an income of Rs. 18,93,020/-, which was selected for scrutiny. The Ld. PrCIT observed that the case was selected to examine large cash payments made towards credit card bills, specifically Rs. 5,35,500/- to ICICI Bank. The AO failed to make a meaningful enquiry into this issue during the assessment proceedings. The Ld. PrCIT initiated proceedings under Section 263, finding that the AO did not bring to tax the unaccounted income from these cash payments. During the revision proceedings, the Ld. PrCIT found that the assessee's explanation of the cash source was inconsistent and insufficient. The Ld. PrCIT concluded that the cash payments and payments through third-party cheques (Rs. 3,34,750/-) represented the assessee's undisclosed income, as the assessee failed to provide a satisfactory explanation.

Issue 2: Genuineness of LTCG Claimed as Exempt Under Section 10(38)

The Ld. PrCIT observed that the assessee claimed LTCG of Rs. 38.26 lakhs, primarily from shares of M/s. Gateway Distributors Limited, which raised doubts due to abnormal profits of 1700% and the company's lack of business activities. The AO allowed the exemption without a detailed enquiry. The Ld. PrCIT found that the shares were later amalgamated with Monotype India Limited, which also had no significant business activities. The Ld. PrCIT concluded that the LTCG was not genuine, relying on the preponderance of probability principles and the investigation reports indicating price rigging by Mr. Naresh Jain. The Ld. PrCIT directed the AO to bring the LTCG under tax as undisclosed income under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE.

Conclusion:

The Ld. PrCIT concluded that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interests. The AO failed to make necessary enquiries into the sources of cash payments and the genuineness of LTCG. The Ld. PrCIT directed to tax Rs. 5,35,500/- as unexplained cash payments and Rs. 3,34,750/- as third-party cheque payments under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE. Additionally, the LTCG of Rs. 35,10,447/- was brought to tax as undisclosed income. The assessee's appeal was dismissed, confirming the Ld. PrCIT's findings and directions.

---