Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the redemption fine and penalty imposed on import of old and used worn clothing were liable to be enhanced in the Revenue's appeal.
Analysis: The goods were imported without the requisite licence and confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 was therefore sustained. The Tribunal noted that the earlier decision on similar imports had upheld confiscation but reduced the redemption fine and penalty to 10% and 5% respectively, and that the adjudicating authority had already imposed fine and penalty at 19.5% and 7.8% of the assessed value. In the absence of any compelling basis to interfere and considering that the existing amounts were found sufficient to meet the ends of justice, no enhancement was warranted.
Conclusion: The Revenue's request for enhancement of redemption fine and penalty was rejected and the adjudicating authority's order was upheld.