Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal against the processing order under section 143(1) survived after a subsequent scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) was passed for the same assessment year.
Analysis: The subsequent scrutiny assessment covered the same assessment year and had already been completed before the appeal was decided. In these circumstances, the processing order under section 143(1) was treated as merged with the later assessment order under section 143(3). As a result, the challenge to the processing and resulting adjustments ceased to have independent survival. The merits of the additions and disallowances were not examined.
Conclusion: The appeal against the section 143(1) processing order had become infructuous and the assessee succeeded on this jurisdictional and procedural ground.
Final Conclusion: The impugned appellate order was set aside and the assessee obtained relief without any adjudication on the substantive additions.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a subsequent scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) has already been made for the same assessment year, the earlier processing order under section 143(1) merges into it and the appeal against the processing order becomes infructuous.