Gross profit estimation cannot survive when books and vouchers are accepted on remand; restricted expense disallowance was also upheld.

Books of account and supporting vouchers produced before the first appellate authority, and the remand examination by the Assessing Officer accepted them, so an estimated gross profit addition was unsustainable and was deleted. The restricted disallowance out of miscellaneous and allied expenses was also upheld because it was based on the material on record and no infirmity in that factual finding was shown. The revenue's challenge therefore failed on both issues, and the appellate order was left undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the addition made by estimating gross profit at a higher rate was liable to be deleted after the assessee produced books of account and supporting vouchers before the first appellate authority. (ii) Whether the restriction of the disallowance out of miscellaneous and allied expenses required interference.

Issue (i): Whether the addition made by estimating gross profit at a higher rate was liable to be deleted after the assessee produced books of account and supporting vouchers before the first appellate authority.

Analysis: The assessee produced the books of account and supporting evidence before the first appellate authority. A remand report was called for, and the Assessing Officer examined the books, bills and vouchers and accepted the same. In these circumstances, the estimated addition on account of lower gross profit was not supported.

Conclusion: The addition on account of gross profit estimation was correctly deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the restriction of the disallowance out of miscellaneous and allied expenses required interference.

Analysis: The first appellate authority restricted the disallowance on the facts after considering the material on record. No infirmity was shown in that finding.

Conclusion: The restricted disallowance was sustained and no interference was warranted.

Final Conclusion: The revenue's appeal failed on both grounds and the order of the first appellate authority was left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee places books of account and supporting vouchers before the appellate authority and the remand examination by the Assessing Officer accepts them, an estimated gross profit addition is unsustainable; a fact-based restriction of expense disallowance also calls for no interference absent error.

---