Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, finds assessment invalid under Section 147 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, condoning the delay in filing the appeal and finding the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, finds assessment invalid under Section 147
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, condoning the delay in filing the appeal and finding the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 invalid. The Tribunal held that the additions made under Section 69 were not justified, concluding that the assessment order was void ab initio. As a result, the additions made by the Assessing Officer were set aside, and the assessee succeeded on merit. The Tribunal pronounced the order on 30th August 2023.
Issues Involved: 1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. Validity of reopening assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. 3. Merits of additions made under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act.
Condonation of Delay: The Tribunal addressed the delay of 43 days in filing the appeal. The assessee, a Sanyasi associated with Shree Swaminarayan Seva Gurukul Trust, cited heavy rain and water logging as reasons for the delay. The Tribunal found no intentional or deliberate delay and condoned the delay to serve substantial justice.
Validity of Reopening Assessment: The assessee challenged the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 and the issuance of notice under Section 148. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had objected to the reopening from the beginning and had raised similar grounds before the CIT(A). The Tribunal admitted the additional ground of appeal, finding that the facts required for adjudication were already on record and no new facts needed to be brought.
Merits of Additions: The Tribunal considered the merits of the additions made under Section 69. The assessee argued that the same issue of cash deposits, which was the basis for reopening the assessment for A.Y. 2009-10, had been accepted after detailed investigation, and no new deposits were made in the current assessment year. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's submission that the deposits belonged to Shree Swaminarayan Seva Trust and were sourced from old FDs. The Tribunal concluded that the reopening under Section 147 was invalid and held the assessment order void ab initio. Consequently, the assessee succeeded on merit as well.
Conclusion: The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the additions made by the Assessing Officer were set aside. The Tribunal announced the order in open court on 30th August 2023.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.