1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Petition Dismissed: No Grounds Found to Interfere with Judgment; Delay Condoned and Applications Disposed.</h1> The SC dismissed the special leave petition, finding no grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment/order. The delay was condoned, and all pending ... Exemption from Entry tax - expression 'Manufacturing Dealer' as used in the Notification dated 18.2.2003 (Annexure-2 to the Revision Application) issued under Section 4-B of the Uttar Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 2000 - it was held by High Court that It is the Assessee who had made the first sale and shall be deemed to be a manufacturer dealer and liable to claim benefit of the exemption Notification dated 18.02.2003. HELD THAT:- There are no ground to interfere with the judgment/order impugned in this petition. SLP dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition as it found no grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment/order. Delay was condoned and any pending applications were disposed of. Justices B. V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan presided over the case.