Auditor Change Justifies Filing Delay: Penalty Deleted The ITAT Amritsar allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal held that the change of auditor constituted a valid reason for the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The ITAT Amritsar allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal held that the change of auditor constituted a valid reason for the delay in filing the tax audit report for the relevant assessment year. Considering that the assessee was not a habitual defaulter, the penalty imposed under section 271B was deemed unjustified and ordered to be deleted.
Issues: The appeal against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) u/s 250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961 for A.Y. 2017-18.
Issue 1: Delay in filing tax audit report
The assessee was liable to tax audit u/s 44AB of the Act for the impugned assessment year. The tax audit report, although audited on 30.09.2017, was uploaded on 24.01.2018, after the due date of 07.11.2017. The ld. AO imposed a penalty u/s 274 r.w.s. 271B amounting to Rs. 86,140 due to the delay. The assessee contended that the change of auditor led to the delay, and the report was filed within the prescribed time for other assessment years. The ld. AR argued that the change of auditor was a valid reason for the delay, and there was no habitual default in filing tax audit reports. Citing a similar case, the AR emphasized that delay due to change in personnel handling accounts can be a reasonable ground as per u/s 273B of the Act.
Decision:
The ITAT Amritsar, comprising Dr. M. L. Meena, Accountant Member, and Sh. Anikesh Banerjee, Judicial Member, considered the submissions and documents on record. They found that the change of auditor was a valid reason for the delay in filing the tax audit report for the impugned assessment year. Noting that the assessee was not a habitual defaulter, the Tribunal held that there was sufficient cause for the delay. Consequently, the penalty u/s 271B of Rs. 86,140 was deemed liable to be deleted. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 11.07.2023.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.