Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeals, partly allows assessee's appeals. CIT(A) to re-examine issues.

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and partly allowed the assessee's appeals for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to re-examine certain issues, including the validity of the notice under Section 153C, disallowance of capital work in progress, and additional spill over depreciation. The CIT(A) was also instructed to provide a copy of the approval under Section 151 to the assessee for further verification.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of Notice under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act.
2. Disallowance of Capital Work in Progress.
3. Treatment of Subsidy under Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme.
4. Taxability of Dividend Income.
5. Disallowance of Additional Spill Over Depreciation.
6. Cross Appeals for Assessment Years 2009-10 and 2010-11.

Summary:

1. Validity of Notice under Section 153C:
The assessee challenged the validity of the notice under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, claiming it was invalid. The CIT(A) upheld the validity of the assessment proceedings under Section 153C. However, it was noted that the assessment was unabated, and thus the Assessing Officer could not disturb completed proceedings without incriminating material. The Tribunal restored the issue back to the CIT(A) for verification of the approval under Section 151, which was not provided to the assessee, and to decide the validity of the assessment proceedings under Section 153C accordingly.

2. Disallowance of Capital Work in Progress:
The Assessing Officer disallowed the assessee's claim of Rs. 10,53,83,193/- as capital work in progress, treating it as a bogus expenditure. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer's conclusion was based on unserved notices and the statement of Mr. Pravin Aggarwal, without proper verification. The Tribunal restored the issue to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee to provide additional evidence.

3. Treatment of Subsidy under Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme:
The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision to treat the subsidy of Rs. 8,12,15,141/- as capital in nature and chargeable to tax. This issue was not pressed by the assessee before the Tribunal and was dismissed as infructuous.

4. Taxability of Dividend Income:
The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's action of treating Rs. 1,16,24,021/- received as dividend income from M/s Alexandria Carbon Black Limited, Egypt, as taxable in India. This issue was also not pressed by the assessee before the Tribunal and was dismissed as infructuous.

5. Disallowance of Additional Spill Over Depreciation:
The CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to withdraw the disallowance of additional spill over depreciation allowance of Rs. 24,35,82,219/-. The Tribunal restored this issue back to the CIT(A) to decide afresh, considering the factual finding of whether the assessment was abated or not.

6. Cross Appeals for Assessment Years 2009-10 and 2010-11:
Both parties agreed that the grounds raised in the cross appeals for assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 were identical or consequential to assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal decided these appeals mutatis mutandis.

Conclusion:
The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, while the appeals of the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to re-examine certain issues and provide a copy of the approval under Section 151 to the assessee.

---