Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of Appellant on Service Tax issue, allows appeal, sets aside demand.</h1> <h3>M/s Anand Dewelling Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commr. of CGST & Central Excise, Patna</h3> The Tribunal allowed the appeal in the case involving contravention of conditions under Notification No. 1/2006-ST by the Appellant, who had inadvertently ... Contravention of the condition imposed under the Notification No. 01/2006 - CENVAT Credit availed - demand along with interest and penalty denying the benefit of notification - HELD THAT:- Admittedly the fact of Cenvat Credit and utilization of the same has been recorded by the Appellant in their ST-3 Returns. Only on the basis of scrutiny of these Returns, the Department has issued the Show Cause Notice. Therefore, this proves that the Appellant has not suppressed any fact but has declared the details of Cenvat Credit taken and their utilization in the ST 3 Returns. Therefore, their explanation that this was an inadvertent error on their part, is to be accepted. It is also seen that after the OIO was passed, they have reversed the entire Cenvat Credit. In the present case, the Appellant has reversed the entire Cenvat Credit taken. Therefore, the confirmed demand of Rs.22,13,962/- along with interest is required to be set aside. However, as pointed out by the Learned AR, it is seen that the Appellant has only reversed the Cenvat Credit without paying the relevant interest - the Appellant is required to pay the interest for the period when the Cevat Credit was taken till the time they have reversed the Cenvat Credit, as per the applicable rate of interest at that particular point of time. Since the Appellant has contravened the conditions imposed under in the Notification, they cannot be absolved from penalty and they are also required to pay the penalty - thus they are required to pay penalty of Rs.1.25 lakhs. Appeal allowed in part. Issues involved: The issues involved in the judgment are regarding the Appellant's contravention of the conditions imposed under Notification No. 1/2006-ST, specifically related to taking Cenvat Credit while providing construction services and the subsequent demand of Service Tax without abatement.Summary:Issue 1: Contravention of conditions under Notification No. 1/2006-STThe Appellant, a provider of construction services, had taken Cenvat Credit while availing the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 1/2006-ST, which required payment of Service Tax on only 33% of the consideration without taking Cenvat Credit. The Department issued a Show Cause Notice demanding Service Tax on the entire consideration due to the Appellant's utilization of Cenvat Credit. The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand, which was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals), leading the Appellant to appeal before the Tribunal.Issue 2: Reversal of Cenvat CreditThe Appellant contended that the Cenvat Credit was inadvertently taken and was fully reversed after receiving the Order-in-Original. The Appellant relied on case laws to support their argument that the reversal of Cenvat Credit amounts to non-availment, seeking allowance of the appeal.Decision:Upon hearing both sides and examining the documents, the Tribunal noted that the Appellant had declared the Cenvat Credit and its utilization in their ST-3 Returns, indicating no suppression of facts. The Tribunal accepted the explanation that the utilization of Cenvat Credit was an inadvertent error, especially since the Appellant had reversed the entire credit. Citing relevant case laws, including the Supreme Court and Tribunal decisions, the Tribunal held that the reversal of Cenvat Credit equated to non-availment, thereby allowing the appeal. The confirmed demand was set aside, but the Appellant was directed to pay interest for the period until the reversal of Cenvat Credit and a penalty of Rs.1.25 lakhs for contravening the conditions of the Notification.Conclusion:The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand but requiring the Appellant to pay interest and penalty for contravening the conditions under Notification No. 1/2006-ST.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found