Court upholds challenge to tax notice issued to non-existing entity, restrains further action pending next hearing. The Court held in favor of the petitioner, allowing the writ petition to proceed despite the absence of a Board Resolution. The challenge to a notice ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court upholds challenge to tax notice issued to non-existing entity, restrains further action pending next hearing.
The Court held in favor of the petitioner, allowing the writ petition to proceed despite the absence of a Board Resolution. The challenge to a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2017-18 was upheld, with the Court deeming it void ab initio due to being issued in the name of a non-existing entity. The Court restrained further steps on the notice until the next listing date. The issue of a company ceasing to exist under a Scheme of Arrangement and its liability under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act was scheduled for further hearing.
Issues involved: The issues involved in the judgment are the preliminary objection regarding the absence of a Board Resolution accompanying the writ petition, the challenge to a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2017-18, and the question of whether a company that ceases to exist due to a Scheme of Arrangement approved by the National Company Law Tribunal can be proceeded against under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Preliminary Objection: The Department contended that in the absence of a Board Resolution accompanying the writ petition, it should not be entertained, citing the decision in State Bank of Travancore vs. Kingston Computers India Pvt. Ltd. This Court, however, found that the said decision was in the context of a suit governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, whereas the present writ petition was accompanied by a Power of Attorney, thus holding in favor of the petitioner.
Challenge to Notice under Section 148: A notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2017-18 was challenged as being void ab initio due to being issued in the name of a non-existing entity. Citing the decision in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Maruti Suzuki India Limited, it was argued that such issuance is a substantive illegality. The Court issued notice to the respondents and restrained them from taking further steps pursuant to the impugned show cause notices dated 23 March 2023 and 14 March 2023 until the next date of listing.
Company Ceasing to Exist under Scheme of Arrangement: The facts of the present writ petition raised the question of whether a company ceasing to exist following approval by the National Company Law Tribunal under a Scheme of Arrangement could be proceeded against under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court noted the similarity of the issues with a previous case and deemed the matter to require consideration, scheduling it for further hearing on 12.09.2023.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.