Petition Dismissed: Court Upholds Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, Cites Compliance with Section 148A Requirements.

The court dismissed the petition challenging the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, stating that the petitioner had the opportunity for a hearing as required by Section 148A. The court found that the notice contained sufficient information for the petitioner to respond effectively, despite the petitioner's argument of insufficient foundational material and statutory bar under Section 149(b). The court clarified that the inquiry under Section 148A is not detailed but must inform the assessee of reasons suggesting income escaped assessment. The petitioner was advised to pursue alternative statutory remedies.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.
2. Consideration of the reply submitted by the petitioner/assessee.
3. Applicability of Section 149(b) and the absence of foundational material.
4. Interpretation of Section 148A of the Income Tax Act.

Summary of Judgment:

Issue 1: Validity of the Notice Issued under Section 148
The petitioner challenged the notice dated 28.04.2023 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that the order under Section 148A(d) did not meet the foundational prerequisites. Despite no information suggesting that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment, the impugned order under Section 148A(d) was passed, leading to the issuance of the notice under Section 148.

Issue 2: Consideration of the Reply Submitted by the Petitioner/Assessee
The petitioner contended that the impugned order/notice was issued without considering the reply submitted by the petitioner/assessee. However, it was not disputed that the opportunity of being heard as contemplated by Section 148A(b) & (c) was afforded by the Revenue, and the reply of the petitioner/assessee was obtained.

Issue 3: Applicability of Section 149(b) and the Absence of Foundational Material
The petitioner argued that the notice under Section 148 was untenable due to the statutory bar under Section 149(b) and the absence of books of accounts/documents/evidence revealing a case of escaped assessment. The court emphasized that the show-cause notice must contain enough information to disclose the intention of the Assessing Officer, enabling the assessee to respond effectively.

Issue 4: Interpretation of Section 148A of the Income Tax Act
The court discussed the newly inserted Section 148A, which provides an additional opportunity for the assessee to be heard before reopening a case of escaped assessment. The court clarified that the inquiry under Section 148A is not a detailed one but is meant to inform the assessee of the reasons and information suggesting that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. The court held that the statute does not obligate the Assessing Officer to supply material/evidence supporting the show-cause notice, provided the notice contains sufficient information revealing the opinion formed by the Assessing Officer.

The court noted that certain High Courts had taken a contrary view, but those judgments did not have persuasive value as they did not consider the foundational principle of interpreting taxing statutes. The court emphasized that the veracity and genuineness of the material/evidence forming the opinion of the Assessing Officer should not be examined while exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 or supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution.

Conclusion
The court dismissed the petition at the admission stage, granting the petitioner the liberty to avail the statutory alternative remedy under the Income Tax Act in accordance with the law.

---