Classification of CMO Residue under the specific crude oil tariff heading prevailed over the residual entry, defeating duty and penalty demand.

CMO Residue manufactured from crude oil was treated as classifiable under Chapter Heading 27090000 rather than the residual heading 27139000 because the product was found to be a remnant of crude oil distillation and the specific tariff entry prevailed over the residual entry under the General Rules of Interpretation. The test report relied on by the lower authorities was considered unreliable for classification since the sample was not supplied in sealed form and the request for retest was not addressed. On that basis, classification was determined from the tariff text, chapter notes and interpretative rules, and the demand of duty, together with consequential interest and penalty, was held unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether CMO Residue manufactured from crude oil was classifiable under Chapter Heading 27090000 or under Chapter Heading 27139000, and whether the duty, interest and penalty demand could survive on the basis of the test report.

Analysis: The test report on which the lower authorities relied was held unreliable for classification purposes because the sample was not made available in sealed form to the assessee and the request for retest was not considered. Classification was therefore required to be determined from the tariff entries, chapter notes and the General Rules of Interpretation. Chapter Heading 27139000 is a residual entry for other residues of petroleum oils obtained from bituminous minerals, whereas Chapter Heading 27090000 is a specific entry covering petroleum oils and oils obtained from bituminous minerals, crude. Since CMO Residue was found to be a remnant of distillation of crude oil, the specific entry was held to apply. The view was also supported by the earlier Tribunal decision cited on the same product category.

Conclusion: CMO Residue was held classifiable under Chapter Heading 27090000 and not under Chapter Heading 27139000. The demand of duty, along with the consequential interest and penalty, was held unsustainable.

---