Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petitions challenging orders passed under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were maintainable when the petitioner had not availed the statutory appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The impugned orders arose from assessment proceedings and the petitioner had been given an option to pay tax, interest and part of the penalty within the stipulated time, which was not exercised. The Court noted that the proper course was to challenge the assessment orders in statutory appeal under Section 107, and found no merit in invoking writ jurisdiction against the Section 74 orders.
Conclusion: The challenge to the orders under Section 74 was rejected and the writ petitions were dismissed, with liberty to file statutory appeals within the time granted by the Court.