Section 12AB registration requires scrutiny of both objects and activities before denying relief for alleged community benefit.

Registration under section 12AB cannot be refused solely on the premise that a trust's objects benefit a particular religious community; the authority must examine the trust deed, actual activities, and the true scope of its charitable character before applying the bar under section 13(1)(b). As the trust's activities had not been properly and independently scrutinised, and supporting material on objects and activities was not fully considered, the refusal was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee and permitting further documents.

---

---

Issues: Whether rejection of the application for registration under section 12AB was justified when the objects were treated as being for the benefit of a particular religious community and the activities had not been properly examined, and whether the matter should be restored for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The assessee had sought registration under section 12AB on the basis of its trust deed, activities, and supporting documents. The rejection order proceeded on the premise that the objects were charitable in nature but were for the benefit of a particular religious community, attracting the bar under section 13(1)(b). The record showed, however, that the activities of the trust were not independently examined in the manner required, even though the trust was longstanding and had earlier been granted provisional registration. The governing principle emerging from the authorities referred to was that where a trust has both religious and charitable features, the decisive enquiry is whether its activities are confined to a particular community or extend more broadly, and whether the objects and activities are genuinely charitable in law.

Conclusion: The rejection could not be sustained on the existing record. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh consideration of the registration application after giving the assessee an of hearing and permitting supporting material on the objects and activities.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent of setting aside the impugned refusal and directing reconsideration of the registration application in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: Where registration under section 12AB is refused on the footing that the trust benefits a particular religious community, the authority must still examine the trust's actual activities and the true scope of its objects before denying registration.

---