Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transportation arrangement for tank trucks under the agreement with HPCL amounted to transfer of the right to use goods and, therefore, a sale exigible to tax under the MVAT Act.
Analysis: The governing test is whether the transaction satisfies the attributes of a transfer of the right to use goods, namely identification of the goods, a legal right in the transferee to use them, and exclusion of the transferor during the period of such use. On a reading of the agreement and work order as a whole, the tank trucks remained registered in the assessee's name, the permits and licences were retained by the assessee, the operating expenses and risks were borne by the assessee, and HPCL only regulated the manner in which transportation services were to be rendered. The contractual clauses relied on by the revenue were directed to ensuring uninterrupted and safe carriage of petroleum products and did not divest the assessee of possession or effective control. The arrangement was, therefore, one for transportation services and not a transfer of the right to use goods.
Conclusion: The transaction did not amount to a transfer of the right to use goods and was not a deemed sale under the MVAT Act. The answer is in favour of the assessee.