Court dismisses petition challenging waqf validity due to beneficiary issue and lack of genuine intention. Estate Duty Act applies.

The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of the waqf created by Gulam Ahmad Khan. The court found that the inclusion of a beneficiary with no blood relation to the waqif contradicted the principles of a waqf-alal-aulad, and noted that Gulam Ahmad Khan did not demonstrate a genuine intention to create a waqf. Additionally, the court held that Gulam Ahmad Khan retained a life interest in the property, making the reservation fall within the scope of Section 12 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, thereby denying exemption from paying estate duty.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the waqf created by Gulam Ahmad Khan.
2. Applicability of Sections 5 and 12 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.

Summary:

1. Validity of the Waqf:
The petitioner challenged the assessment order, appellate order, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order regarding the validity of the waqf created by Gulam Ahmad Khan. The petitioner argued that the waqf was valid under the Mussalman Waqf Validating Act, 1913, and that once a waqf is created, the waqif is divested of his title to the waqf properties. However, the court noted that the inclusion of Mst. Hasina Khatun as a beneficiary, who had no blood relation with the waqif, contradicted the tenets of a waqf-alal-aulad. The court observed that Gulam Ahmad Khan continued to treat the waqf property as his own, including it in his income tax returns and selling parts of it to pay personal debts, indicating no actual dedication to the waqf. The court cited the Supreme Court judgment in 'Chhedi Lal Misra v. Civil Judge, Lucknow' and the Privy Council's decision in 'Mohammad Ali Mohammad Khan v. Mt. Bismillah Begam' to conclude that there was no genuine intention to create a waqf, thus rendering the waqf invalid.

2. Applicability of Sections 5 and 12 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953:
The petitioner contended that the Tribunal erred in applying Sections 5 and 12 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, arguing that the reservation of interest in the waqf property by Gulam Ahmad Khan did not amount to passing of the property upon his death. The court, however, found that Gulam Ahmad Khan had reserved the right to modify the waqf deed and made provisions for his maintenance, thereby retaining a life interest in the property. The court referred to the Division Bench judgment in 'Hamid Hussain v. Controller of Estate Duty', which held that such reservations fall within the scope of Section 12, leading to the conclusion that the petitioner could not claim exemption from paying estate duty.

Conclusion:
The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the orders of the assessment authority, the appellate authority, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, and confirming the invalidity of the waqf and the applicability of estate duty.

---