Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant, acting as a ship chandler, violated the Customs Act, 1962 by supplying masks as ship stores on a foreign-going vessel so as to justify revocation of permission and penalty under Section 117.
Analysis: The supply was made through the prescribed ship-store procedure, including filing of a manual shipping bill and obtaining endorsements at the relevant stages. The goods were loaded as stores on a foreign-going vessel for the Philippines Government, and the records showed that the authorities had allowed the shipment. Section 89 of the Customs Act, 1962 contemplates free export of stores in such quantities as the proper officer may determine having regard to the size of the vessel, crew, passengers, and voyage. On the facts, the appellant had followed the procedure and there was no established deviation or violation warranting penal action. The DGFT notification relied upon was held to be inapplicable to ship stores in the circumstances.
Conclusion: The revocation of permission and the penalty were unsustainable and were set aside in favour of the assessee.