TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal partially allows appeal, remands accounting issues, upholds unexplained expenditure addition, dismisses accounting charges disallowance.</h1> <h3>Total Integrated Design (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO, Ward-25 (3), New Delhi.</h3> Total Integrated Design (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO, Ward-25 (3), New Delhi. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Addition of INR 54,514 as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Rejection of the assessee's books of accounts.3. Addition of INR 54,10,504 by applying the Gross Profit (GP) ratio on gross receipts.4. Disallowance of INR 3,60,000 for accounting charges due to non-deduction of tax.Summary:Issue 1: Addition of INR 54,514 as unexplained expenditure under Section 69CThe assessee contended that the difference of INR 54,514 arose due to post-negotiation reductions in payments initially reported in Form 15CA. The Tribunal found no evidence supporting this claim and upheld the addition as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C, affirming the lower authorities' findings. Thus, Ground No.1 raised by the assessee was rejected.Issue 2: Rejection of the assessee's books of accountsThe Tribunal noted that the lower authorities had rejected the books of accounts based on discrepancies and a fall in the GP ratio. However, it was observed that no specific defects in the books were pointed out. The Tribunal emphasized that mere fall in GP ratio is not sufficient for rejecting books without concrete evidence of discrepancies. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer (AO) to verify the correctness of the assessee's claim regarding the mismatch of figures in Form 26AS and decide the issue afresh in accordance with the law. Thus, Ground Nos. 2 & 3 raised by the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.Issue 3: Addition of INR 54,10,504 by applying the GP ratioThe Tribunal found that the lower authorities had sustained the addition based on a fall in the GP ratio without pointing out any specific discrepancies in the accounts. The Tribunal held that such findings should not be based on pure guesswork and must have a foundation. The AO was directed to verify the correctness of the assessee's claim regarding the mismatch of figures in Form 26AS and decide the issue afresh. Thus, Ground Nos. 2 & 3 raised by the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.Issue 4: Disallowance of INR 3,60,000 for accounting chargesThe assessee did not press Ground No.4 during the hearing. Consequently, this ground was dismissed as not pressed.Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal remanding the issues related to the rejection of books of accounts and the addition based on the GP ratio back to the AO for fresh consideration. The addition of INR 54,514 as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C was upheld, and the disallowance of INR 3,60,000 for accounting charges was dismissed as not pressed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
