Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the importer was entitled to CVD exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004 despite being a trader and not having availed CENVAT credit on inputs.
Analysis: The condition in the notification is that the importer should not have availed CENVAT credit on the inputs. It was undisputed that no such credit had been availed by the respondent. The fact that the respondent was a trader, and therefore not in a position to avail such credit, did not defeat the exemption where the factual condition in the notification stood satisfied. The earlier view on the same notification and issue, as affirmed by the Supreme Court, governed the controversy.
Conclusion: The respondent was eligible for the CVD exemption, and the departmental challenge failed.