Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the matter concerning recovery of alleged excess Modvat benefit should be reconsidered by the authorities in the light of the earlier decision on Rule 57D(1).
Analysis: The petitioners had taken Modvat credit on sulphuric acid used in manufacture, and the Court noted that Rule 57D(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 protects credit where part of the input is contained in waste, refuse or by-products arising in the course of manufacture. The Court also noted its earlier decision holding that full Modvat benefit is available once the entire duty-paid input is proved to have been put to use, even if some spent acid remains. Since that decision was not before the respondents when the impugned notice was issued, the Court found it appropriate that the matter be re-examined by the competent authority with reference to that precedent.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the concerned authorities for fresh decision after considering the earlier judgment, and recovery under the impugned notice was stayed until such decision.