Cooperative bank wins additional tax claim appeal based on genuine claim despite no revised return

The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal of a cooperative bank, holding that the bank was entitled to an additional claim of Rs 22,50,000 under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the claim genuine despite not being made through a revised return, citing precedents where such claims were allowed. The tribunal emphasized that the failure to file a revised return was the only reason for disallowance by the assessing officer and upheld the bank's right to the deduction.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The issues involved in this case are the disallowance of an additional claim of deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the authority of the appellate tribunal to entertain such claims without the filing of a revised return.

Issue 1: Disallowance of Additional Claim of Deduction:
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the ld. CIT (A)-1, Rajkot, which confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer in disallowing an additional claim of deduction of Rs 22,50,000 under section 36(1)(viii) of the Act. The assessing officer did not allow the claim during the assessment proceedings as it was not made through a revised return.

Issue 2: Authority of Appellate Tribunal to Entertain Additional Claims:
The main contention of the assessee was that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not exercising discretionary powers under section 250 of the IT Act and Rule 46A(6) of the IT Rules to modify the deduction claim, despite the legitimate claim being on record. The assessee argued that the appellate authorities have the power to allow such claims if they are tenable in law, even if not made through a revised return.

Judgment Summary:
The assessee, a cooperative bank, claimed a deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the Act in the return of income. The claimed deduction was Rs 2,40,00,000, while the actual amount carried to the special reserve was Rs 2,62,50,000. The assessing officer did not allow the additional claim made during the assessment proceedings. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, stating that the claim should have been made through a revised return.

In the appeal before the tribunal, it was argued that the claim was genuine, and the only reason for disallowance was the failure to file a revised return. The tribunal referred to various judicial precedents where appellate authorities allowed additional claims not made in the original return. The tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the additional claim of Rs 22,50,000 under section 36(1)(viii) of the Act.

Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and it was held that the assessee was eligible for the additional claim under section 36(1)(viii) of the Act.

---