Appellate Tribunal allows deduction under sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) for Co-op Banks, nominal members not a bar The Appellate Tribunal ITAT PANAJI allowed twin appeals ITA.Nos.228 & 214/PAN./2019 for assessment years 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. The disallowance ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal allows deduction under sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) for Co-op Banks, nominal members not a bar
The Appellate Tribunal ITAT PANAJI allowed twin appeals ITA.Nos.228 & 214/PAN./2019 for assessment years 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. The disallowance of sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction was overturned, citing Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. [2021] 431 ITR 1 (SC), clarifying that nominal members do not affect eligibility for the deduction. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the presence of nominal members does not bar claiming the deduction.
Issues involved: Appeal against CIT(A)'s orders regarding sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction disallowance for assessment years 2015-2016 & 2016-2017 u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The Appellate Tribunal ITAT PANAJI heard twin appeals ITA.Nos.228 & 214/PAN./2019 for the assessment years 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. The appeals arose against the CIT(A), Mangaluru's separate orders dated 19.03.2019 and 08.03.2019, involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The main issue was the disallowance of sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction totaling Rs. 1,31,29,258/- and Rs. 62,99,798/- for the respective assessment years. Both lower authorities had denied the deduction based on the presence of regular as well as nominal members, citing the judgment in Citizen Co-operative Society Limited [2017] 397 ITR 1 (SC).
During the hearing, it was noted that the main grievance of the assessee was the disallowance of sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction. The learned lower authorities had held that the assessee was not eligible for the deduction due to having both regular and nominal members, following the apex court's judgment in Citizen Co-operative Society Limited. The Departmental Representative (DR) relied on this reasoning. However, it was pointed out that a subsequent decision in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., vs. CIT [2021] 431 ITR 1 (SC) had clarified that the presence of nominal members does not disentitle an assessee from claiming the sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction. Consequently, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's substantive ground and allowed the appeals.
In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the twin appeals of the assessee, noting that the presence of nominal members does not preclude the assessee from claiming the sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction. The order was pronounced in the open court on 19.07.2023.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.