Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a writ petition challenging preliminary reports issued at the investigation stage, and questioning the authority's jurisdiction to seek objections and afford personal hearing, was maintainable.
Analysis: The challenge was directed against reports issued only at the preliminary stage of investigation, inviting objections and hearing before any adjudicatory step. The petitioners had been afforded multiple opportunities to submit objections and appear for hearing, but did not avail them. The investigation was found to be traceable to the statutory power of inspection and authorization under the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax regime, and the reliance placed on a different statutory setting was held to be inapplicable. In these circumstances, the writ court found no reason to interfere at the interlocutory stage of the investigation.
Conclusion: The writ petition was premature and was dismissed.