1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Income Tax Tribunal Allows Mark to Market Loss Deduction for Equity Futures</h1> The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal that marked to market loss on open equity stock future contracts is a permissible ... Permissible deduction in the hands of the assessee - marked to market loss on open equity stock future contracts - ITAT had specifically rejected the Department’s contention that the market loss of stock in trade, is not an ascertained liability. Thereby deduction of the amount, on account of the market loss suffered on stock in trade, was held in favour of the assessee as relying upon case of United Commercial Bank, Calcutta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, W.B.-III, Calcutta [1999 (9) TMI 4 - SUPREME COURT] HELD THAT:- We have considered the reasoning of both the forums. Upon reading the High Court’s impugned judgment, no infirmity is seen. As such, no interference is called for in the present matter. Special Leave Petition stands dismissed. Issues involved:The issue involved in this case is whether the marked to market loss on open equity stock future contracts is a permissible deduction in the hands of the assessee.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that the marked to market loss on open equity stock future contracts is a permissible deduction in the hands of the assessee. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) rejected the Revenue's challenge on 21.12.2016, specifically dismissing the Department's contention that the market loss of stock in trade is not an ascertained liability. The ITAT relied on the case of United Commercial Bank, Calcutta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, W.B.-III, Calcutta reported in (1999) 8 SCC 338 to support its decision in favor of the assessee.Upon considering the reasoning of both the forums, the High Court's impugned judgment was found to have no infirmity. Therefore, no interference was deemed necessary in the present matter. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and any pending application(s) were closed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
