Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods included in the Fourth Schedule to the Central Excise Act, 1944 but on which Central Excise duty is not leviable fall within the exclusion in Section 125(1)(h) of the Finance Act, 2019 so as to deny the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019.
Analysis: The exclusion in Section 125(1)(h) applies to persons seeking to make declarations with respect to excisable goods set forth in the Fourth Schedule. The decisive factor is whether the goods are still subject to levy of Central Excise duty. Where the entry in the Fourth Schedule indicates that duty is not leviable, the goods cannot be treated as excisable goods for the purpose of the exclusion. A mechanical reference to inclusion in the Fourth Schedule, without regard to the duty position reflected therein, would defeat the object of the scheme.
Conclusion: The denial of SVLDR Scheme benefits on the ground of Fourth Schedule inclusion was unsustainable, and the Petitioner was held eligible to have its applications processed under the Scheme.