TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether sugar confectionery pieces weighing less than 10 grams, packed in 500 gram packs, were liable to valuation on MRP basis under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or on transaction value under section 4 of that Act. (ii) Whether the demand confirmed under section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be sustained when the differential duty was not actually collected from customers and credit notes were issued.
Issue (i): Whether sugar confectionery pieces weighing less than 10 grams, packed in 500 gram packs, were liable to valuation on MRP basis under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or on transaction value under section 4 of that Act.
Analysis: The applicable principle was that a wholesale pack containing individual confectionery pieces below 10 grams is not to be treated as a retail pack for MRP-based assessment. Rule 34(b) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 exempted packages of 10 grams or less from the requirement of affixing retail sale price, and the substitution of rule 2(j) did not alter that position. The earlier decision in the assessee's own case, as approved by the Supreme Court, governed the issue.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to valuation under section 4A and were assessable under section 4.
Issue (ii): Whether the demand confirmed under section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be sustained when the differential duty was not actually collected from customers and credit notes were issued.
Analysis: Section 11D applies only where a person collects an amount as representing duty of excise and fails to deposit it. On the facts, although the invoices reflected duty at the section 4A rate, the differential amount was not retained because credit notes were issued and the amount was not collected from the customers. The statutory condition for invoking section 11D was therefore not satisfied.
Conclusion: The demand under section 11D was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The valuation dispute was decided in favour of the assessee and the section 11D demand was also set aside, resulting in dismissal of the revenue's appeal and allowance of the assessee's appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: For confectionery sold in wholesale packs, MRP-based valuation does not apply to individual pieces weighing less than 10 grams where the packaged commodities rules exempt such packages from retail price declaration, and section 11D can be invoked only when duty is actually collected and retained from the buyer.
TaxTMI 
