1995 (1) TMI 78 - HC - Central Excise

Court upholds exemption for food products; classification stands unless new circumstances

The Court held that once a classification is made based on certain principles, it cannot be changed without new circumstances or superior authority ... Classification of goods - Established practice - Writ jurisdiction Issues involved: Classification of flavouring essences for edible food products under Central Excise Tariff.Summary:1. The petitioners manufactured flavouring essences for edible food products, claiming exemption under Notification No. 55/75. The Assistant Collector issued a notice challenging this classification, but the Appellate Authority upheld the exemption under the notification. 2. Despite the Appellate Authority's decision becoming final, the Superintendent of Central Excise refused to accept the exemption claim in a subsequent year, leading to a show cause notice from the Collector under Section 35A. The Collector ultimately classified the products under Tariff Item 68, revoking the exemption.3. The petitioners challenged this order through a writ petition, arguing that the Collector's decision contradicted the earlier Appellate Authority's ruling, without any change in circumstances or new evidence to justify the reclassification.4. The Court held that once a classification is made based on certain principles, it cannot be changed without new circumstances or superior authority decisions. The Collector's order was deemed unsustainable and quashed, reinstating the exemption for the petitioners' products as per the Appellate Authority's decision.5. The Court emphasized that in taxation matters, the principle of res judicata does not apply, but a classification should remain unless there are substantial changes. The writ petition was allowed, setting aside the Collector's order and upholding the exemption for the petitioners' products as per the Appellate Authority's decision.