Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (7) TMI 467 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Space selling and pre-works contract advertising receipts were outside tax, and limitation failed without suppression. Space selling or canvassing, without participation in making or preparing an advertisement, was treated as outside advertising agency service and the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Space selling and pre-works contract advertising receipts were outside tax, and limitation failed without suppression.

                            Space selling or canvassing, without participation in making or preparing an advertisement, was treated as outside advertising agency service and the related demand was set aside. Composite advertisement contracts involving design, production and display were held not exigible to service tax for the period before the works contract levy came into force, so the demand on that activity also failed. In the absence of deliberate suppression, collusion or intent to evade tax, the extended limitation period could not be invoked and penalties could not survive. The entire demand, interest and penalties were therefore unsustainable.




                            Issues: (i) Whether the amounts retained/collected in the course of the appellant's advertising-related activity were liable to service tax as advertising agency service, or whether the activity was only space selling outside the taxable net; (ii) whether the demand on composite advertisement contracts styled as works contracts was sustainable for the period prior to the introduction of the relevant works contract levy; and (iii) whether the extended period of limitation and penalties were rightly invoked.

                            Issue (i): Whether the amounts retained/collected in the course of the appellant's advertising-related activity were liable to service tax as advertising agency service, or whether the activity was only space selling outside the taxable net.

                            Analysis: The appellant was registered under advertising agency service and retained only commission on amounts collected for other advertising agencies. The activity found from the record was merely bringing orders and facilitating advertisement placement, which answered to space selling rather than rendering advertising agency service to the client in the statutory sense. The Tribunal also noted the departmental and judicial clarification that mere canvassing or space selling, without involvement in making or preparing the advertisement, does not fall within the taxable service.

                            Conclusion: The demand on this count was not sustainable and is set aside in favour of the assessee.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the demand on composite advertisement contracts styled as works contracts was sustainable for the period prior to the introduction of the relevant works contract levy.

                            Analysis: The contracts were composite in nature and included design, production and display elements. The Tribunal held that composite works contracts were not taxable under the service tax regime applicable to the impugned period, which ended before the introduction of the relevant levy in 2007. As the adjudicating authority had not disputed the composite character of the contracts or the separate tax treatment of the goods element, bifurcation for service tax purposes was impermissible for that period.

                            Conclusion: The demand on composite works contract activity was unsustainable and is set aside in favour of the assessee.

                            Issue (iii): Whether the extended period of limitation and penalties were rightly invoked.

                            Analysis: The Tribunal found no material showing deliberate suppression, collusion, or intent to evade tax. Returns had been filed regularly, the commission component was already taxed, and the remaining receipts were not shown to be taxable in the manner alleged by the department. In the absence of wilful suppression, the extended period under the limitation provision could not be invoked, and penalty could not survive without proof of mala fide intent.

                            Conclusion: Invocation of the extended period and imposition of penalties were wrongful and are set aside in favour of the assessee.

                            Final Conclusion: The entire demand, interest and penalties were found unsustainable on merits as well as on limitation, and the appeal succeeded.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Space selling without participation in the making or preparation of an advertisement is not taxable as advertising agency service, composite works contracts were not exigible to service tax prior to the introduction of the works contract levy, and the extended period cannot be invoked without proof of wilful suppression or intent to evade tax.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found