TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Penalties reduced for gold smuggling; vehicle confiscation overturned for innocent party.</h1> <h3>Shri Debabrata Saha, alias Tulu Saha, Shri Sanjay Ray, Shri Mithun Ghosh Versus Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Kolkata</h3> Shri Debabrata Saha, alias Tulu Saha, Shri Sanjay Ray, Shri Mithun Ghosh Versus Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Kolkata - TMI Issues involved: Penalties imposed against individuals for smuggling gold of foreign origin and confiscation of a vehicle used in the smuggling activity.Summary:Issue 1: Penalties imposed for smuggling gold of foreign originThe Appellant argued that the Department lacked concrete evidence to prove the seized gold was of foreign origin and that proper proceedings were not conducted before concluding the gold was being smuggled. The Advocate prayed for setting aside the penalties and confiscation of the vehicle. On the other hand, the Learned AR contended that the gold was smuggled, supported by statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, where the Appellants admitted to transporting foreign origin gold. The lower Authorities were deemed correct in confiscating the gold and imposing penalties. The Bench reduced the penalties from Rs. 4,00,000/- to Rs. 1,00,000/- each considering the Appellants were carriers and a substantial amount of gold had already been confiscated.Issue 2: Confiscation of vehicle used in smuggling activityThe recorded statements indicated that the third Appellant, Shri Mithun Ghosh, was not involved in the smuggling activity and had lent his vehicle to the other two Appellants unknowingly. However, the Adjudicating Authority did not provide reasons for confiscating the vehicle and imposing a redemption fine. The Commissioner (Appeals) mechanically confirmed the order without addressing the issue of Shri Mithun Ghosh. The Bench concluded that no case was made out against Shri Mithun Ghosh and set aside the confiscation of his vehicle and the penalty imposed on him.In conclusion, the Appeals were disposed of with the penalties reduced for the first two Appellants and the confiscation of the vehicle with an option to redeem set aside for Shri Mithun Ghosh.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
