Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether activation charges collected for activating software embedded in EPABX telecom systems were liable to service tax as Business Auxiliary Service, or whether the transaction was a sale of goods on which sales tax/VAT had been discharged.
Analysis: The transaction was examined in the light of the nature of the software, the invoices raised, and the fact that VAT/CST had been paid on the amounts collected from customers. It was held that the activation of features in the equipment did not create a service obligation in favour of the customers. The appellant acted as a seller of goods, not as a facilitator or commission agent, and the amount collected towards activation charges represented consideration for sale of software features. The reasoning also drew support from the settled position that software, when marketed and transferred on a medium or in a commercially usable form, answers the description of goods. On limitation, the disclosed nature of the transactions in the accounts and invoices negatived suppression or misdeclaration, so the extended period was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The activation charges were not taxable as Business Auxiliary Service and the demand could not be sustained, including for the extended period.
Ratio Decidendi: Where activation of software features forms part of a sale transaction and the consideration is subjected to sales tax/VAT, the amount collected is a sale of goods and not consideration for a taxable service.