TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Software activation charges deemed sale of goods, not service. Appellant prevails on service tax liability and time-bar issue.</h1> <h3>Avaya Global Connect Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Ahmedabad</h3> Avaya Global Connect Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Ahmedabad - TMI Issues involved: The issue involved is whether activation charges for activating software in the EPABX telecom system are liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service when sales tax on the same activity was discharged.Summary of Judgment:Issue 1: Liability for service tax on activation chargesThe appellant collected activation charges for telecom equipment EPABX system, and the department contended that since the activation of software occurred after the sale of equipment, it is liable for service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. However, the Tribunal found that the transaction was a sale of goods, not a service, as the appellant did not provide any service obligation but sold goods to customers. The invoices raised for activation of software indicated payment of VAT/sales tax, further supporting the conclusion that it was a sale of goods. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents to establish that software can be considered goods for taxation purposes. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal.Issue 2: Time-bar for demandThe appellant argued against the demand for a longer period, stating that they had paid Sales Tax/VAT and disclosed the transactions in their Balance Sheet, with no suppression or mis-declaration. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, ruling that no suppression or mis-declaration could be attributed to the appellant, and the demand for a longer period was not sustainable on the ground of limitation. Consequently, the demand for a longer period was rejected.In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowed the appeal, and provided consequential relief, if any, in accordance with the law.This judgment clarifies the tax liability on activation charges for software in the EPABX system, emphasizing the distinction between a sale of goods and a provision of services for taxation purposes. The Tribunal's decision was based on legal interpretations and precedents regarding the definition of goods, supporting the appellant's position that the transaction was a sale of goods and not a taxable service.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
