Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clean energy cess was payable again on clean coal cleared from the washery after cess had already been paid on raw coal removed from the mines, and whether the demand under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1994 with interest under Section 11DD was sustainable.
Analysis: Clean energy cess under Rule 6(1) of the Clean Energy Cess Rules, 2010 is payable on raw coal removed from the mine. The appellant had already paid cess on the gross quantity of raw coal extracted and removed from the mines. Notification No. 4/2010-C.E. dated 22.06.2010 exempts coal products from clean energy cess where the applicable cess has already been paid at the stage of raw coal from which such goods are produced. The clearance of clean coal from the washery was therefore covered by the exemption. The demand under Section 11D could be sustained only if it was established that the appellant had collected excess cess from customers over and above the cess already paid on raw coal. The record did not establish such excess collection, and the differential amounts were explained as price adjustments under MOUs, not as cess.
Conclusion: No further clean energy cess was payable on clean coal cleared from the washery, and the demand under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1994 along with interest under Section 11DD was unsustainable.