SEZ service tax exemption for sub-contractors turns on authorised operations and approval requirements, with remand for fresh adjudication.

Service tax exemption under the SEZ framework was examined for services provided by a sub-contractor at an SEZ site, with the central question being whether the benefit could be denied for lack of separate approval to the sub-contractor or its services. The dispute focused on whether the SEZ Act and Rules, rather than the narrower notification wording, governed eligibility where services were rendered within the SEZ area for authorised operations. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after considering the relevant legal position and cited authorities.

---

---

Issues: Whether service tax exemption under the SEZ framework and the relevant exemption notifications is available to a sub-contractor providing services at the site of a Special Economic Zone unit, and whether the absence of separate approval for the sub-contractor or its services can deny the benefit.

Analysis: The disputed services were rendered by the appellant as a sub-contractor for work ultimately connected with SEZ units and were provided within the SEZ area for the intended project. The Revenue's objection was that the notifications contemplated services to a Developer or SEZ unit with approval and did not expressly cover services rendered through a contractor or sub-contractor. The appellant relied on the SEZ Act, the SEZ Rules, and prior decisions to contend that the location and end-use of the services for authorized operations were material, while contractor-wise approval was only procedural. The record also showed that the controversy involved whether the subordinate notification framework could restrict the broader exemption contemplated under the SEZ enactment and whether separate approval of the sub-contractor's list of services was necessary.

Conclusion: The issue was not finally decided on merits against the appellant. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after considering the relevant legal position and cited authorities.

---