Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether granite slabs were correctly classifiable under tariff item 6802 23 90 or under tariff item 2156 1200, and whether the duty demand founded on the contrary classification could be sustained.
Analysis: The appeal turned on whether the product, in the light of the earlier coordinate bench decision on identical goods, retained its character as granite slabs falling within Chapter 25 or was liable to be taken to Chapter 68. The prior decision had held that the processes undertaken did not justify shifting the goods to Chapter 68 and that the classification remained within the Chapter 25 scheme. The Tribunal followed that view and treated the issue as no longer res integra.
Conclusion: The granite slabs were held to be correctly classifiable under tariff item 2156 1200 and not under tariff item 6802 23 90, so the corresponding demand was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the core classification dispute and was otherwise disposed of with limited verification directions on the remaining quantified demand aspects.