Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (7) TMI 120 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal invalidates AO's assessment reopening, citing lack of jurisdiction and insufficient evidence The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer's reopening of the assessment under section 147/148 was invalid and void ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal invalidates AO's assessment reopening, citing lack of jurisdiction and insufficient evidence

                            The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer's reopening of the assessment under section 147/148 was invalid and void ab initio. The Tribunal found that the AO lacked jurisdiction to issue a notice under section 148 instead of section 153A after a search had been conducted. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the AO did not possess new material to justify the belief that income had escaped assessment and that the additions made based on alleged bogus transactions were not substantiated. The CIT(A)'s estimation of income was also deemed unsustainable.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of reopening the assessment under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to issue notice under section 148 instead of section 153A.
                            3. Whether the Assessing Officer possessed any material to form a belief that income had escaped assessment.
                            4. Legitimacy of the addition made by the Assessing Officer based on the alleged bogus transactions.
                            5. Estimation of income by the CIT(A) and whether the method of accounting adopted by the assessee was acceptable.

                            Summary of Judgment:

                            Issue 1: Validity of Reopening the Assessment under Section 147/148
                            The Tribunal examined whether the Assessing Officer (AO) had the jurisdiction to issue a notice under section 148 for reopening the assessment despite a search conducted under section 132. The Tribunal noted that the AO must satisfy the conditions under section 147, which include having a reason to believe that income had escaped assessment and that this belief must have a rational connection with the information possessed. The Tribunal found that the AO's reasons for reopening the assessment were based on information already available during the original and reassessment proceedings, and thus, the reopening was invalid and void ab initio.

                            Issue 2: Jurisdiction of the AO to Issue Notice under Section 148 Instead of Section 153A
                            The Tribunal emphasized that section 153A, which starts with a non-obstante clause, mandates the issuance of a notice under this section once a search has been conducted. The Tribunal held that the AO could not take action under any other section for the assessment year in question, and thus, the notice under section 148 was invalid.

                            Issue 3: Possession of Material by the AO to Form Belief of Escaped Income
                            The Tribunal scrutinized the AO's possession of material to form a belief that income had escaped assessment. The AO referred to a ledger account and statements from directors of M/s. Silverpoint Infratech Limited, which were already available during prior assessments. The Tribunal found that these statements did not provide new information justifying the reopening of the assessment, as they were already considered in earlier proceedings.

                            Issue 4: Legitimacy of Addition Based on Alleged Bogus Transactions
                            The Tribunal examined the AO's addition of Rs. 66,40,68,972/- based on the alleged bogus transactions with M/s. Silverpoint Infratech Limited. The Tribunal noted that the AO failed to establish a complete chain of evidence showing that the money ultimately returned to the assessee. The Tribunal found that the AO's reliance on vague and incomplete information was insufficient to justify the addition.

                            Issue 5: Estimation of Income by CIT(A)
                            The Tribunal reviewed the CIT(A)'s estimation of income at 6% of the contract receipts. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) did not provide specific reasons for rejecting the assessee's method of accounting, which had been accepted in prior assessments. The Tribunal concluded that the CIT(A)'s ad hoc estimation was unsustainable.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment and the addition made by the AO. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the AO's actions were without sufficient reason and the estimation of income by the CIT(A) was unjustified. The order was pronounced on 03.04.2023.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found