Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a manufacturing unit set up at the same site after surrender of excise registration, transfer and sale of machinery, and a long closure could be treated as a new industrial unit eligible for exemption under Notification No. 20/2007-CE dated 25.04.2007.
Analysis: The record showed that the earlier unit had ceased operations after the ban, the factory licence and excise registration were surrendered, machinery was transferred or sold, and fresh clearances, fresh licensing, and new registrations were obtained before recommencing production. The material supported the conclusion that the later establishment was not a mere renovation or continuation of the old unit, but a fresh industrial setup entitled to the benefit of the notification.
Conclusion: The unit was held to be a new unit and the exemption under Notification No. 20/2007-CE dated 25.04.2007 was held admissible in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the exemption claim failed, and the order allowing the benefit was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an earlier industrial unit has been closed for a substantial period, its registrations surrendered, and fresh statutory clearances and licensing are obtained for recommencement with new machinery, the later setup may be treated as a new unit rather than a renovated continuation for the purpose of an exemption notification.