Police and GST notices to advocates seeking client details in alleged GST fraud probes struck down due to s.126 privilege

Notices issued by police and GST authorities to advocates seeking client information in alleged GST fraud matters were held ultra vires because advocate-client communications are privileged under s.126 Evidence Act, except where made to further a future crime; hence the appeal was maintainable. The Single Bench direction to investigate fake cases was required to be confined within law, but was misconstrued by issuing standardized s.160 CrPC notices and by generalizing all assessees as fraudsters; those notices were set aside, with liberty to investigate specific assessees lawfully. Appeal disposed of.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Leave to prefer appeal against an order dated 3rd April, 2023.
2. Condonation of delay of 32 days in filing an appeal.
3. Maintainability of an intra-court appeal by a third party against an order passed by a Single Bench.

Summary:
Issue 1:
The applicant sought leave to prefer an appeal against the order dated 3rd April, 2023, which disposed of the writ petition. The applicant, not a party to the writ application, claimed that the order seriously affected him. After hearing both parties, the court granted leave to the applicant to prefer the appeal against the said order, allowing the application.

Issue 2:
An appeal was filed seeking condonation of a 32-day delay in filing. The appellant's counsel provided an explanation for the delay, which the court found sufficiently justified. The court allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing.

Issue 3:
The third-party appeal was against an order passed by a Single Bench, challenged by the State counsel on grounds of maintainability. The court considered the maintainability of the appeal and found it valid, citing legal provisions protecting lawyer-client communications. The court clarified the order's scope, directing proper investigation methods and setting aside standardized notices issued by authorities. It emphasized that GST authorities should conduct thorough investigations before initiating proceedings under the GST Act, ensuring compliance with the law. With these directions, the appeal was disposed of.

This judgment addressed the issues of seeking leave for appeal, condoning a delay in filing, and the maintainability of an intra-court appeal by a third party, ensuring legal procedures were followed and rights were protected.

---