Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue was entitled to enhancement of redemption fine and penalty in respect of confiscated imported old and used worn clothing imported without the requisite import licence.
Analysis: The goods were admittedly covered by the restriction applicable to Tariff Item No. 63090000 and were imported without the necessary specific licence. Confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 was therefore justified. The prior Tribunal decision relied upon had reduced redemption fine and penalty after considering the admitted licensing violation and the factual matrix, and the present order followed that approach. On the record, the adjudicating authority's fixation of redemption fine and penalty was found sufficient to meet the ends of justice, and no infirmity was found warranting enhancement.
Conclusion: The demand for enhancement of redemption fine and penalty was rejected and the order of the adjudicating authority was sustained in favour of the respondent.