Tariff classification of steel trolleys as furniture prevailed over accessory treatment, making them liable to excise duty.

Steel trolleys manufactured for mounting room coolers were classified as excisable steel furniture under Tariff Item 40, because they were made of steel tubes and answered that description. The Court rejected the argument that they were non-dutiable accessories of coolers under Tariff Item 29A, holding that use with another product does not prevent classification under the specific furniture entry where no separate tariff entry for trolleys exists. The result was that the trolleys remained liable to excise duty as steel furniture, and the assessee's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the steel trolleys manufactured for mounting room coolers were classifiable as excisable steel furniture under Tariff Item 40, or as non-dutiable accessories of coolers under Tariff Item 29A.

Analysis: The trolleys were made of steel tubes and answered the description of steel furniture. There was no separate tariff entry for trolleys. The Court rejected the attempt to treat them as accessories of coolers merely to avoid duty, noting that Tariff Item 29A did not assist the appellant's contention. The existing tariff structure supported classification under the furniture entry rather than exclusion from duty.

Conclusion: The trolleys were held dutiable as steel furniture and not as non-dutiable accessories of coolers, which was against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the impugned trolleys were liable to excise duty under the furniture entry, and the High Court's view was left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an article squarely falls within a specific tariff entry as furniture, it cannot be treated as a non-dutiable accessory merely because it is used with another dutiable product and no separate entry exists for it.

---