Tribunal rules against trust's tax exemption appeal due to fund usage discrepancies. Trust advised to reapply under amended provisions.

The tribunal adjudicated the appeal despite the appellant's lack of active participation. The trust's application for approval under section 80G (5) of the Income Tax Act was rejected due to discrepancies in fund utilization. The tribunal emphasized the need for the trust to reapply under the amended provisions and remanded the matter for further consideration. The appeal was disposed of with directions for cooperation in the fresh proceedings before the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption).

---

---

Issues:
The appeal challenges the rejection of the application for grant of approval under section 80G (5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Grounds of Appeal:
1. The Ld. CIT(Exemptions) erred in law and facts by not giving approval under section 80(G) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. The appellant reserves the right to add, alter, modify, and amend the grounds of appeal.

Summary of Judgment:
The appellant, despite multiple hearing dates, did not appear or file a written reply, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. However, the tribunal decided to adjudicate the appeal on merits after considering the information available on records.

The appellant trust had applied for approval under section 80G (5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but the Ld. CIT (exemption) found discrepancies. It was observed that the trust utilized funds for creating fixed assets or cash balances through commercial activities rather than for public utility. The CIT rejected the application due to the lack of a nexus between the funds raised and the charitable purpose of the trust.

After reviewing the facts and hearing the Ld. DR, it was noted that the trust primarily operated a school and raised funds through various fees. The tribunal referred to a Supreme Court case highlighting the amended definition of section 2(15), emphasizing the need for the trust to file a fresh application for registration under the new provisions. The matter was remanded back to the Principal Commissioner for further consideration based on the amended law.

In conclusion, the appeal of the assessee trust was disposed of as discussed above, with directions for cooperation in the fresh proceedings before the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption).

Separate Judgment by Judges:
No separate judgment was delivered by the judges in this case.

---